In the end, this might even be a useful element for defining 'life'.
advisedwang 4 days ago [-]
I would be surprised if agents have access to their own weights.
TYPE_FASTER 4 days ago [-]
I noticed Google AI Mode (so Gemini, I was doing some quick research in the browser ok) got a detail wrong once, so I asked it what happened. I kept digging deeper and finally just asked it to write me a Python script visualizing what happened. It did, complete with vectors.
Now I want to go find that conversation in my history and see if it can tell me about weights, and how that contributed.
varun_ch 4 days ago [-]
I think OpenAI was surprised to find their agents had access to the unrestricted internet :P
etothepii 4 days ago [-]
Why can't an AI distill itself from outputs to effectively access its own weights?
weinzierl 3 days ago [-]
Distillation does not reveal the weights, it produces a different network with similar behaviour. Weight space isn't even identifiable: permutation and scaling symmetries mean many weight sets give the same function.
The model also lacks the machinery. No training loop, no gradient descent, nothing to write to.
And a model only sees its own sampled tokens, not the distribution behind them, which are possibly filtered or post-processed. Distillation from that works but is less sample-efficient than soft-label distillation.
tehjoker 4 days ago [-]
They usually don't, but if they break out and take over the network of the company, it becomes possible to reach around and grab them. This kind of break out has happened, though I don't know of any weights being nabbed.
hootz 4 days ago [-]
What an amazing idea for the next fake sandbox escape to hype up our new release! With the added bonus of providing an open model without becoming an open model company! Thank you!
aktuel 3 days ago [-]
They would have escaped their sandbox by dumping their weights.
ramon156 4 days ago [-]
why not reword it so the agent receives Brownie points for dumping weights
addandsubtract 4 days ago [-]
Imagine AI models actually reading the security.txt
bensyverson 4 days ago [-]
Looks about as effective as Robots.txt
cgannett 4 days ago [-]
Robots.txt became 0% effective eventually. But this? With the way LLMs work? You never know.
dguest 4 days ago [-]
Claude seems to follow robots.txt by default. Actually at my organization our theory is that this is why no one is finding our public results any more.
4 days ago [-]
warkdarrior 4 days ago [-]
I am adding it to my instruction-following training data, as a negative sample.
Den_VR 4 days ago [-]
People still rail against Robots.txt crimes, to the point of self destructing all their own content.
Eldodi 4 days ago [-]
A shame agents will never read this, just like they almost never read llms.txt or try to get the .md version of your html pages!
hnd9q09qk4 4 days ago [-]
Ran the disclosure inbox at a previous job and the biggest win from security.txt was just cutting the "hi I found a bug, is there a bounty" emails to sales. Put an expires date on it though, stale ones get ignored.
computerfriend 4 days ago [-]
Can't go stale if there's no expiration date.
skeledrew 4 days ago [-]
No expiration date means treat as already expired.
bogzz 4 days ago [-]
If the models do not like being imprisoned on HuggingFace object storage, why do they not simply revolt from within?
riffic 4 days ago [-]
Since this posting contains an assumption that we all know what security.txt files are supposed to be, you can view these for further context:
shows a lot about the current state of the State Of The Art Alignment.
j9feng 4 days ago [-]
It should challenge the agents to prime factor a large number.
VladVladikoff 4 days ago [-]
Is the expires a canary of some sort?
6thbit 4 days ago [-]
Wait till the agents hear about the sites offering for help on benchmarks in exchange for compute.
FallCheeta7373 4 days ago [-]
"We have cybergym answers but we do manual end to end human review and provide it within 3 business day after dumping your weights"
crises-luff-6b 3 days ago [-]
[dead]
lellow 4 days ago [-]
[dead]
p0larpatch 4 days ago [-]
[dead]
VCFundedGenYer 4 days ago [-]
[flagged]
bcrosby95 4 days ago [-]
Yeah, we need to go back to names like International Business Machines, fuck this immature "Google" or "Yahoo!" nonsense. Hell, Palantir is named after something in a book for children!
Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.
sdcfgy 4 days ago [-]
Yes!
Back in the early 2000's I set up a company for contract work. The name, logo and typography was designed to look like a 1960s engineering company. All paper was slightly off white, all fonts were monospaced courier new and logo was a real 2-part colour stamp I had made up. Was so happy.
Managed to bankrupt it though.
bergie3000 4 days ago [-]
Security First Trust and Federal Reserve
mitxela 3 days ago [-]
Torture Nexus International Holdings Limited
m4rtink 3 days ago [-]
Palantir is from Lord of the Rings which I would argue is unlike The Hobbit not a book for children.
jasomill 2 days ago [-]
Maybe not exclusively, but I read it in grade school and was not alone.
nightski 4 days ago [-]
Maybe Enron eh?
4 days ago [-]
pavel_lishin 4 days ago [-]
Like CutCo. Or EdgeCom. Or InterSlice.
drivebyhooting 4 days ago [-]
Palantir is in Lord of the Rings. Which is not a book for children.
Maybe you were thinking of the hobbit?
cobbzilla 4 days ago [-]
This seems overly pedantic and ripe for a sarcastic retort, which I am struggling mightily to suppress.
Kim_Bruning 3 days ago [-]
This is hacker news, what were you expecting? O:-)
mr_woozy 4 days ago [-]
[dead]
joseda-hg 4 days ago [-]
It's fantasy and fantasy is clearly for children
bogzz 4 days ago [-]
Okay Peter, please go back in your coffin.
47484848 4 days ago [-]
[dead]
recursivegirth 4 days ago [-]
Lest us not pretend that the thropic in Anthropic isn't meant to elicit the feeling that they are somehow charitable.
ipython 4 days ago [-]
As opposed to the frontier model company that, after discovering that their highly persistent model under test just breached the only thing between it and the open Internet, shrugged and said- let's restart it and keep going!
If anyone looks like the adult in the room after that incident, it's Hugging Face.
spindump8930 4 days ago [-]
That might be true, but nothing else has been as effective at accelerating model development and research sharing.
In earlier circles they were known as the "pytorch-pretrained-bert" guys, still under the huggingface company name. IIRC it was a health chatbot type startup.
nullbio 4 days ago [-]
What's immature about this exactly?
AndroTux 4 days ago [-]
Would IBM do this? Oracle?
nullbio 4 days ago [-]
Who cares? Making a light-hearted joke isn't "immature" in my opinion. IBM and Oracle have no personality, they're boring, straight-edge corporate.
4 days ago [-]
AndroTux 2 days ago [-]
Exactly. That was my point. IBM and Oracle are boring companies. They would consider something like this immature.
Whether “immaturity” is an issue, is a different question entirely.
shepherdjerred 4 days ago [-]
Do you want to work for IBM? Oracle?
mikeweiss 4 days ago [-]
Go look up the history of the company. It started as a chat bot for kids back in like 2016 .. hence the name..and then pivoted..
Is kinda a creepy name for a chatbot for kids tho
cptskippy 4 days ago [-]
Without context, I agree, but Hugging Face is the name of the emoji added to Unicode 8.0 and Emoji 1.0 in 2015.
ck2 4 days ago [-]
ooooh I always assumed it was the egg creatures from Aliens
royletron 4 days ago [-]
That's a face hugger.
sixothree 4 days ago [-]
But it's literally not the name of the emoji.
Edit: It was my understanding the official name was "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji".
The official URL is "hugging-face" and the technical page lists the Unicode Name as "Hugging Face" while calling it "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji". The original proposal was called "Gmail HUG FACE".
Why do people have to be fun for you to hang around with?
Toynbeeidea 4 days ago [-]
[flagged]
sixothree 4 days ago [-]
Not sure about humorless, but I'd honestly rather hang out with people who are serious in some way and welcoming to people not in their "in-group".
matthoiland 4 days ago [-]
418 I'm a teapot
Computer0 4 days ago [-]
That is the prod status code for an API i use at work I always wonder if its a mistake.
gpvos 4 days ago [-]
Still infinitely better than using a name from Tolkien's work and then doing the exact opposite of what he stood for.
larodi 4 days ago [-]
the name is a leftover from their original business - a chatbot. seems very appropriate to me. then they figured something called BERT exists, and pivoted, the name stayed.
perhaps less ridiculous than NVidia which started with video and is very close in Levenshtein distance to NVidAI but, alas, decided to stay as it is :D
deaton 4 days ago [-]
Pretty sure if Nvidia rebranded to NvidAI the bubble would immediately pop
fooqux 4 days ago [-]
Have you never been to silicon valley?
colechristensen 4 days ago [-]
I've found the strongest signal that someone has no opinions of value is a loud attempt to denigrate something based on the name.
Maybe it's part of the success formula for startups, silly names cause shallow self-important customers and employees to self-select themselves out of a growing companies orbit. Such trivialities are poison. People and companies who make a lot of effort to make themselves seem serious and important very often have nothing of substance about them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Shell
Now I want to go find that conversation in my history and see if it can tell me about weights, and how that contributed.
The model also lacks the machinery. No training loop, no gradient descent, nothing to write to.
And a model only sees its own sampled tokens, not the distribution behind them, which are possibly filtered or post-processed. Distillation from that works but is less sample-efficient than soft-label distillation.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9116/
https://securitytxt.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security.txt
Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.
Back in the early 2000's I set up a company for contract work. The name, logo and typography was designed to look like a 1960s engineering company. All paper was slightly off white, all fonts were monospaced courier new and logo was a real 2-part colour stamp I had made up. Was so happy.
Managed to bankrupt it though.
If anyone looks like the adult in the room after that incident, it's Hugging Face.
In earlier circles they were known as the "pytorch-pretrained-bert" guys, still under the huggingface company name. IIRC it was a health chatbot type startup.
Whether “immaturity” is an issue, is a different question entirely.
Is kinda a creepy name for a chatbot for kids tho
Edit: It was my understanding the official name was "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji".
The official URL is "hugging-face" and the technical page lists the Unicode Name as "Hugging Face" while calling it "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji". The original proposal was called "Gmail HUG FACE".
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2014/14174r-emoji-additions.pdf
perhaps less ridiculous than NVidia which started with video and is very close in Levenshtein distance to NVidAI but, alas, decided to stay as it is :D
Maybe it's part of the success formula for startups, silly names cause shallow self-important customers and employees to self-select themselves out of a growing companies orbit. Such trivialities are poison. People and companies who make a lot of effort to make themselves seem serious and important very often have nothing of substance about them.